Dashboard
Live & Results
Upcoming
To-do
Tourns
Invites
Captains
News
The Superbru Herald - Superbru News

New: Improved Predictor performance views on Superbru Football

A new update on the Superbru Football app introduces a 'Points achieved per round' view.

Available for each of the leagues that we cover on the Superbru Football app, this new display provides a fresh angle on your personal performance.

For each league that we cover, we've created six points tiers based on community data that give you something to aim for in each round.

These tiers are each represented by an emoji, giving you an idea of how you've done in a certain round at a glance.



The screenshot above is taken from the Premier League tab on the Superbru Football app on Hutch's profile.

As you can see, the table also contains data from last season.

This is so that in addition to taking on other players when playing Superbru Football, you can now more visibly look to improve upon your own performance in each tournament.

For instance, last season Hutch managed two 🔥 rounds and 7 👏 rounds, so he's looking to improve upon those in 2026-27, ideally with a standout 😮 round too!

Where to find it?

While there's a designated tab for the Premier League as it's our most popular tournament, this new view is available for every league that we cover on Superbru Football.

In any tournament, to access this new round-by-round points view for either yourself or other players, simply tap on a name from a leaderboard.

To view your own data, you can also access things via the Profile tab for active tournaments.

Once you've tapped through to your round overview, you can also swipe to a new 'Predictions' tab for tournaments that are underway.

The Predictions tab provides a more detailed breakdown of each round you've completed so far.

As an example, here's Jack's Scottish Premiership start, with a strong Round 1 followed by a mediocre Round 2.



You can check out your own performance breakdown in each tournament now on Superbru Football.

Tournaments that are yet to begin will of course only show last season's data for now, but those of you playing the Championship or the Scottish Premiership will already have updates showing for 2026-27.
110,676 caps
Nice ❤️❤️❤️❤️
19 Aug 10:01
11,526 caps
Very cool feature guys. This gives us more info on our own performances each week. Good luck all
19 Aug 11:57
37,205 caps
Yes, it's great to be able to check how badly I am doing. I hope for better predictions in football tournaments, overall.😮 19 Aug 12:58
11,526 caps
I feel the same way Andy. Hope you are well my friend? Good luck in PL and all the other tournaments. 20 Aug 20:50
727 caps
Another great step forward from you guys at superbru 26 Aug 13:41
11,936 caps
That's a great new feature - well done Superbru team.
20 Aug 14:17
41,674 caps
Still think CONSISTENCY should be better rewarded. Make Slam Points worth more but harder to get. It sticks in my craw that I can get 7/10 correct but miss out on a getting a single 3 point Exact due to a marginal VAR offside or a goalie going down like a sack of spuds after being breathed on. Yet these Exact FLUKERS might get 3 bang on but be miles out on the other 7, yet still get more SB points than a 7/10 picker with no Exacts. It's just WRONG. It rewards LUCK far more than SKILL.
21 Aug 03:53
11,936 caps
I have said before I would prefer 2.5 for an exact, or 2 for a close. But the Superbru team gives a lot of priority to exacts. I agree though - the width of the post in the last minute is often the difference between an exact (or correct outcome) and a wrong. 21 Aug 15:45
3,039 caps
but the width of the post in the last minute in real life can also determine who wins the league, just saying 29 Aug 12:56
11,936 caps
Yeah true mate. 29 Aug 19:57
13,518 caps
Agree when you are spot on it is a fluke but after a while better tippers tend to get closer to the scores. So its the old argument does one reward skill or luck. Rewarding luck annoys the old timers, It's also like a comparison between players in Fantasy and score tipping rugby "usually" two different groups of leaders at the top of the pool.
24 Aug 21:59
11,936 caps
Yeah we had a discussion about this during the World Cup mate. Fleeto got so many closes that he laughed and asked if he was getting an award for being the close king, Enadiz intelligently argued that if you got 100 closes (it was 100 games in of the 104) you would have 150 points and be the overall winner. Then I made the point that a lot of exacts and low closes is less sustainable; what actually shows you're reading games right is having a lot of closes and even slightly more than you have exacts.

I think if someone has like 10 exacts and 1 close that is variance that will end. 25 Aug 22:34
11,936 caps
About the above dicsussion. Just realised something, Jack (and I had a 7 point swing against me vs Jersey Puller at the weekend as it's a 6 point swing from wrong to exact and exact to wrong, so the last min goal for Ipswich got him the exact and the bonus point for the slam lol).

The current system means a single kick of the ball in the 94th minute can cause an 8-point leaderboard swing between two players. If Player A is on 4 correct outcomes with a live Exact, and Player B is on 4 correct outcomes with a live Wrong: a late goal can strip Player A of 3 exact points and their Slam point, while handing Player B 3 exact points and their Slam point.

I know you won't change it for next season or anything, but it does feel like moving close from 1.5 to 2 would add more points to the game and more balance.
26 Aug 18:54
11,936 caps
I guess your argument against this would be a football game between title rivals in a league is also zero sum all or nothing like this - one winning equates in the other losing. The so-called 6 pointer. 26 Aug 18:56
11,936 caps
Plus if there was only 1 point disparity between close and exact, and not 1.5, fewer people would make risky picks. And the leaderboards would naturally be more congested too.

I can see why you keep it the way you do for many reasons. But I think as JP and us others are saying there's definitely legitimate arguments for moving close to 2 points or exact to 2.5 points. I know it would be easy to code it - the problem is how it would change the points totals from previous years to the future by adding (or taking away) points to and from the game. But you have proved before across sports you are receptive to changing the scoring system.

I don't know if you will reply, but if you do, what do you think? 26 Aug 20:23
11,526 caps
Dave you have provided a valid argument to change the scoring system. I love how after stating your reasons for the change you also provide why they shouldn't change it.
Keep providing your insite on the game. I am learning so much I didn't know. Thanks Dave.
1 Sep 04:29